Measuring and understanding the world through science
-
- Young Academy
- Research projects
- Measuring and understanding the world through science

All sciences share the common goal of seeking to understand the world. The methodological approaches chosen to achieve this goal, however, vary greatly. This is evident in the differing importance attached to quantification and empirical reasoning across various scientific disciplines. What is the potential and where are the limits of an approach oriented toward numbers and measurements, or, conversely, of an approach that chooses a non-quantifiable method? How do these methodological approaches influence the models and images that the sciences construct of the world?
The projects in the 6th subprogram focus their research on these various aspects of measuring and mapping the world.
Supported by

Quantification in Politics and Law: The Case of Economic Sanctions
The project “Quantifying and Operationalizing the Proportionality of International and Inter-Local Sanctions” aims to further develop the principle of proportionality so that it can be applied to the assessment of international and inter-local sanctions. Against the backdrop of international law, and in particular fundamental and human rights standards, the goal is to develop a legal framework for addressing the issue of sanctions. Quantifying the effects of international sanctions using existing data is intended to contribute to streamlining the proportionality review and the imposition of sanctions overall.
Publications resulting from the project:
- Valta, Matthias (2019): State-Targeted Economic Sanctions: Between Sovereignty and the Protection of Human Rights. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. (=lus Publicum Vol. 283)
- Valta, Matthias (2017): Quantifying and Operationalizing the Proportionality of International Economic Sanctions. In: Schweiker, Marcel/Hass, Joachim/Novokhatko, Anna/Halbleib, Roxana (eds.): Measuring and Understanding the World through Science, pp. 97–116.
Collegiate
Professor Matthias Valta
The Monetization of Politics in the 12th and 13th Centuries
The research project “Money, Favor, and Grace” examined the impact of the monetization of Europe during the High Middle Ages on the political order, combining perspectives from cultural and economic studies. The increasing availability and presence of money led to royal favor and grace, as well as the goodwill of subordinates, being increasingly measured and negotiated in monetary terms. The payments made in various areas (fines, compensation, settlements, alliances, bribes, etc.) reveal a tariff system of political order that underwent a profound transformation during this period.
Publications resulting from the project:
- Büttner, Andreas (2018): The Lifeblood of Affairs and the Root of All Evil. The Role of Money in Papal Relations with Frederick II. In: The Roman Curia and Money. From the Mid-12th Century to the Early 14th Century, ed. by Werner Maleczek, Ostfildern. (=Lectures and Research/Constance Working Group for Medieval History, Vol. 85)
- Büttner, Andreas/Mauntel, Christoph (2017): Does Clio Count Too? – Measurement and Understanding in Historical Research. In: Schweiker M./Hass J./Novokhatko A./Halbleib R. (2017): Measurement and Understanding in Science. Interdisciplinary Approaches. Wiesbaden, pp. 43–55.
Collegiate:
Assistant Professor Andreas Büttner, Ph.D.
European Data Protection and Data Sharing in Genetic Research: Interdisciplinary Considerations and International Implications
The research project addressed the challenges of data exchange and data protection in transnational genetic research in order to explore how data processing in this sector can be regulated. Particular attention was paid to self-regulatory measures and their integration into data protection law. The topic was examined through a collaboration between the fields of biotechnology and law.
Publications resulting from the project:
- F. Molnár-Gábor, J. O. Korbel (2020). Genomic Data Sharing in Europe Is Stumbling – Could a Code of Conduct Prevent Its Downfall? In: EMBO Molecular Medicine 12: e11421.
- M. Philips, F. Molnár-Gábor, J. O. Korbel, A. Thorogood, Y. Joly, D. Chalmers, D. Townend, B. M. Knoppers (2020). The PCAWG Consortium. Of Clouds and Genomic Data Protection. In: Nature 578: 31–33, doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-00082-9.F.
- S. Yakneen, S.M. Waszak (2020). PCAWG Technical Working Group, M. Gertz, J.O. Korbel, PCA-WG Consortium. Butler enables rapid cloud-based analysis of thousands of human genomes. In: Nat. Biotechnol. 38: 288−292, doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0360-3.
- F. Molnár-Gábor ( 2019). Processing of Patient Data in the Cloud under the GDPR, with Particular Reference to Transnational (Research) Aspects. In: I. Spiecker gen. Döhmann, A. Wallrabenstein (eds.), Healthcare in the Age of the GDPR, Peter Lang: 121–141.
- F. Molnár-Gábor ( 2019). The Right to Not Know – Issues of Legalization in the Context of Big Data in Modern Biomedicine. In: G. Duttge, Ch. Lenk (eds.), The So-Called Right to Not Know: Normative Foundations and Practical Applicability, Mentis: 83–117.
- M. Prictor, M. A. Lewis, A. J. Newson, M. Haas, S. Baba, H. Kim, M. Kokado, J. Minari, F. Molnár-Gábor, B. Yamamoto, J. Kaye, H. J. A. Teare (2019). Dynamic Consent: An Evaluation and Reporting Framework. In: Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 14(5): 1–12.
- M. Thu Nguyen, J. Goldblatt, R. Isasi, M. Jagut, A. Hechtelt Jonker, P. Kaufmann, L. Ouil-lade, F. Molnár-Gábor, M. Shabani, E. Sid, A. M. Tassé, D. Wong-Rieger, B. M. Knoppers (2019).On behalf of the IRDiRC-GA4GH Model Consent Clauses Task Force. Model consent clauses for rare diseases research. In: BMC Medical Ethics 20: 55.
- B. M. Knoppers, F. Molnár-Gábor, M. Philips, J. O. Korbel, D. Townend (2018). Expanding the human rights focus on health data under the GDPR, *Nature* 558: 189.
- F. Molnár-Gábor (2018). Germany: A Fair Balance Between Scientific Freedom and Data Subjects’ Rights? In: Human Genetics 137(8): 619–626.
- F. Molnár-Gábor, L. Kaffenberger (2018). Privacy Shield—The Significance of the European Commission’s Adequacy Decision. Legal Protection in the Transatlantic Processing of Personal Data. In: Journal of Data Protection 18(4): 162–168.
- F. Molnár-Gábor ( 2018). The Regulation of Scientific Research in the GDPR. In: J. Täger/German Foundation for Legal Informatics (eds.), Legal Issues of Digital Transformation—Shaping Digital Change Processes through Law. Proceedings of the Autumn Academy: 159–173.
Conferences, workshops, and seminars organized as part of the project:
- Final conference of the WIN-Kolleg project “Data sharing in transnational cancer genomics: practical and ethico-legal issues” on May 27, 2019 (Glasgow).
- Conference “Law 4.0 – Innovations from Legal Labs”(2017, Heidelberg, in collaboration with the German Foundation for Law and Informatics).
- Seminar : “Data Processing in Biomedicine: Technical, Regulatory, and Societal Challenges” (Summer Semester 2019/Summer Semester 2018, Key Competency Course, Faculty of Law, Ruprecht Karls University of Heidelberg, 2 hours per week)
Fellow students:
- Dr. Fruzsina Molnár-Gábor
- Dr. Jan O. Korbel
Analyzing Texts – Interpreting Findings. Classical Studies and the Digital Humanities: A Promising Synergy
The project aims to identify the opportunities offered by the digital humanities for text analysis within the classical sciences, to reflect on the impact of quantitative analysis on established methods, and to undertake a necessary reorientation of its own methods through interdisciplinary dialogue with modern philology and history.
Academy of Sciences and Humanities more information on the WIN project at the Heidelberg Academy of Sciences and Humanities :https://www.texte-messen.uni-freiburg.de
Fellow students:
- Stylianos Chronopoulos, Ph.D. candidate(external link)
- PD Dr. Felix K. Maier(external link)
- Dr. Anna Novokhatko(external link)
Interdisciplinary research and experimentation platform for the empirical analysis of legal terminology
The project focused on the interdisciplinary development and pilot testing of a freely accessible research and experimentation platform (CAL2Lab) for data-driven, legal-linguistic analysis of legal language and conceptual systems. Based on the reference corpus of German-language law (JuReko), the platform provides semi-automated tools to prestructure the analysis of legal terminology formation across several relevant dimensions. The focus is on the contextual definiteness or indefiniteness of legal expressions, both diachronically (conceptual change over time) and synchronically (a cross-section of legal schools, media, text types, areas of law, etc.). The development and ongoing testing of the platform took place in cooperation with representatives from the fields of legal philosophy, sociology, and legal linguistics, as well as officials from the legislative branch (BMJV).
For more information about the WIN project of the Heidelberg Academy of Sciences and Humanities the conference, visit: https://cal2.eu/index.php
Publications resulting from the project:
- Gauer, Isabelle, Hanjo Hamann, & Friedemann Vogel: The Legal Reference Corpus (JuReko). In: Burr (ed.): DHd 2016: Modeling – Networking – Visualization. Leipzig: nisaba, 2nd ed. 2017, pp. 156–158. Available online at www.dhd2016.de/boa-2.0.pdf.
- Hamann, Hanjo & Friedemann Vogel (eds.): The Fabric of Language and Law. Special Issue of the International Journal of Language & Law (JLL), 2017. 109 pages, available online at https://www.languageandlaw.eu/jll/article/view/361.
- Hamann, Hanjo & Friedemann Vogel: The Fabric of Language and Law. Towards an International Research Network for Computer-Assisted Legal Linguistics (CAL²), in: Hamann/Vogel (previous entry), pp. 101–109.
- Hamann, Hanjo & Friedemann Vogel: Critical Mass: Aspects of a Quantitatively Oriented Hermeneutics Using the Example of Computer-Assisted Legal Linguistics. In: Schweiker/Hass/Novokhatko/Halbleib (eds.): Measuring and Understanding in Science: Interdisciplinary Approaches. Wiesbaden: Metzler, 2017, pp. 81–96.
- Hamann, Hanjo & Friedemann Vogel: Evidence-Based Jurisprudence Meets Legal Linguistics – Unlikely Blends Made in Germany, BYU L. Rev., Vol. 43 (2018), pp. 1473–1501.
- Hamann, Hanjo & Friedemann Vogel (2019): Seven Years of Language & Law. Editors’ Progress Report on the Journal of the International Language & Law Association, International Journal of Language & Law 8 (2019), pp. 1–8.
- Vogel, Friedemann, “Calculating Legal Meanings? Drawbacks and Opportunities of Corpus-Assisted Legal Linguistics in Making the Law (More) Explicit.” In Stein and Giltrow (eds.), *The Pragmatic Turn in Law*. New York/Boston: Mouton, 2016, pp. 287–306.
- Vogel, Friedemann, Benjamin Bäumer, Fabian Deus, Jan Oliver Rüdiger & Felix Tripps: The Meaning of the Adjective “Geschäftsmäßig” in Legal Jargon and Everyday Language in the Mass Media. A Legal Linguistic Corpus Study as an Example of Computer-Assisted Semantic Analysis in Law, in: LeGes 30 (2019) 3.
- Vogel, Friedemann, Isabelle Gauer, & Hanjo Hamann: Understanding Legal Semantics Through Measurement. CAL2Lab – A Computer-Assisted Research and Experimentation Platform as a Contribution to Data-Driven Legal Linguistics. In: Vogel (ed.): Law Is Not Text: Studies on Speechlessness in the Written Rule of Law. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2017, pp. 177–184.
- Vogel, Friedemann, Hanjo Hamann, & Isabelle Gauer: “Computer-Assisted Legal Linguistics: Corpus Analysis as a New Tool for Legal Studies,” Law & Social Inquiry, Vol. 43 (2018), pp. 1340–1363. DOI: 10.1111/lsi.12305.
Conferences, workshops, and seminars organized as part of the project:
Conference : "The Fabric of Language and Law: Discovering Patterns through Legal Corpus Linguistics" March 18–19, 2016, Heidelberg.
Fellow students:
- Dr. Hanjo Hamann
- Prof. Dr. Friedemann Vogel
Religious Interpretation and Empirical Quantification in Medieval Europe
As part of the WIN project “The Surveying of the World,” the aim was to investigate the role that measuring and counting played as a descriptive method and explanatory model in the mapping of the world in medieval Europe. The project was developed in close connection with the applicant’s planned postdoctoral research project. Initial findings have been published, and a comprehensive database has been created and is being continuously updated. In terms of content, it has become clear that the topic of quantitative recording encompasses significantly more areas of medieval life than just geography. While a comprehensive study would be desirable, the project’s approach necessitates a thematically limited analysis.
God, as the Creator, measures the earth with a compass.
Old Testament Bible, 1477, Heidelberg, University Library, Cod. Pal. germ. 16, fol. 9v.
Publications resulting from the project:
- Andreas Büttner, Christoph Mauntel(2017): Does Clio Count Too? – Measurement and Understanding in Historical Research. In: M. Schweiker, J. Hass, A. Novokhatko, R. Halbleib: Measurement and Understanding in Science. Interdisciplinary Approaches. Wiesbaden, pp. 43–55.
- Mauntel, Christoph/Oesterle, Jenny (2017): Water Worlds. Oceans and Seas in Medieval Christian and Arabic Cosmography. In: Gerlinde Huber-Rebenich/Christian Rohr/Michael Stolz (eds.): Water in Medieval Culture. Uses, Perceptions, and Symbolism. Berlin/Boston, pp. 59–77. (The Middle Ages, Supplements 4)
- Mauntel, Christoph (2017): Encompassed by the Ocean. Water as a Constitutive Element of Medieval World Orders, in: Friedrich Edelmayer et al. (eds.): Borders, Interactions, Conflicts, Interdisciplinary Approaches. Berlin/Boston, pp. 57–74. (Studies on the History and Culture of the Iberian and Ibero-American Countries)
- Mauntel, Christoph (2016): Measuring the World: Religious Interpretation and Empirical Quantification in Medieval Europe. In: Yearbook of the Heidelberg Academy of Sciences and Humanities . Heidelberg, pp. 291–294/302–306
Collegiate:
Dr. Christoph Mauntel
Science and Contemporary Politics
The WIN-Kolleg research project *Knowledge (Science), Numbers, and Power*, completed in May 2017, explored the relationship between science and politics in general, and the role of numbers in the political sphere in particular. The follow-up project “Working Numbers”: Science and Contemporary Politics sought to build directly on the scientific research findings obtained through interdisciplinary work, further develop them, and make them usable for political decision-makers through a deliberately practice-oriented approach. As a result, the project succeeded in generating concrete recommendations for (European) political practice, discussing them with relevant political actors at an international event held at the European Parliament in Brussels, and thereby ensuring the sustainability of the academic research findings published in book form.
Publication resulting from the project:
Prutsch, J. (ed.): Science, Numbers and Politics. Basingstoke [etc.]: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019. See https://www.palgrave.com/gp/book/9783030112073
Conferences, workshops, and seminars organized as part of the project:
- Academy Conference: Science, Numbers, and Politics (April 28–30, 2016, Heidelberg).
- Conference: “'Working Numbers': Science and Contemporary Politics”(June 8–10, 2017, Heidelberg).
- International Workshop:“Science, Numbers, and Politics: ‘Scientific Evidence’ and ‘Expert Knowledge’ in Contemporary Policy-Making” (May 20–21, 2019, European Parliament, Brussels).
- International Conference:“Experts, Knowledge, and the (De)legitimization of European Politics” (May 23–24, 2019, University of Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne).
Collegiate:
PD MMag. Dr. Markus J. Prutsch, M.Res.
Reflections on Methodology and Its Implications
This project took an interdisciplinary approach to examining two aspects of daily life—pain and comfort—with regard to parallels and discrepancies in their perception and their dynamic changes (adaptation and alliesthesia), by combining psychological pain research with building physics-based comfort research. In the first part of the project, a methodology consisting of qualitative and quantitative elements was successfully developed, enabling these processes to be better measured and understood. In the second part of the project, the focus was on understanding and explaining dynamic perception processes and their influencing factors. The project yielded important findings, such as the realization that the unconsidered use of scales to assess perception can lead to distortions; solutions to this problem were developed and validated, as was the description of a new theoretical concept of seasonal alliesthesia.
Publications resulting from the project:
- Becker S., Fuchs X., Schakib-Ektaban K., Schweiker M. (2020). What does "moderate pain" mean? Subgroups with different conceptions of rating scales evaluate experimental pain differently. European Journal of Pain 24(39): 625–638. doi:10.1002/ejp.1514
- Schweiker, M., Schakib-Ekbatan, K., Fuchs, X., & Becker, S. (2020). A seasonal approach to alliesthesia. Is there a conflict with thermal adaptation? Energy and Buildings 212: 109745. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109745
- Schweiker M., André M., Al-Atrash F., Al-Khatri H., Alprianti R.R., Alsaad H., Amin R., Ampatzi E., Arsano A.Y., Montazami Azadehk, Azar E., Bahareh B., Batagarawa A., Becker S., et al. (2020). Evaluating assumptions of scales for subjective assessment of thermal environments – do laypersons perceive them the way we researchers believe? Energy and Buildings 211: 109761. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109761
- Schweiker M., Abdul-Zahra A., Afonso de André M., Al-Atrash F., Al-Khatri H., Risky Alprianti R., Alsaad H., Amin R., Ampatzi E., Arsano A.Y., Azadeh M., Azar E., Bahareh B., Batagarawa A., Becker S., et al. (2019). The Scales Project, a cross-national dataset on the interpretation of thermal comfort scales. Scientific Data, 6(289): 1–10. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.9805289
- Fuchs X., Becker S., Schakib-Ekbatan K., Schweiker M . (2018). Subgroups with different conceptions of scales rate room temperatures differently. Building and Environment 128: 236–247. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.11.034
- Schakib-Ekbatan K., Becker S., Cannistraro A., Schweiker M. (2018). What do people associate with “cold” or “hot”? - Qualitative analyses of the ASHRAE scale labels. In: 10th Windsor Conference – Rethinking Comfort.
- Schweiker, M., Becker, S., and Schakib-Ekbatan, K. (2018). Thermal adaptation and seasonal alliesthesia: Two conflicting concepts? In: 10th Windsor Conference - Rethinking Comfort.
- Becker, S., & Schweiker, M. (2017). Reflections and perspectives on the research fields of thermal comfort in the workplace and pain. In M. Schweiker, J. Hass, A. Novokhatko, & R. Halbleib (Eds.), Measuring and Understanding in Science. Springer: 187–206.
- Fuchs X., Schweiker M., Becker S. (2017). Do “cool” and “painful” mean the same thing to different people? Subgroups with different conceptions of scales also show different responses under experimental conditions. In: Program of the 59th Conference of Experimental Psychologists (TeaP 2017), Dresden.
- Krause, M.J., and Becker, S. (2017). Conclusion – Measuring and Understanding the World through Science. In: M. Schweiker, J. Hass, A. Novokhatko, and R. Halbleib (eds.), Measuring and Understanding in Science – Interdisciplinary Approaches. Springer: 27–286.
- Schweiker, M., Fuchs, X., Becker, S., Dovjak, M., Shukuya, M., Hawighorst, M., & Kolarik, J. (2017). Challenging the assumptions related to the usage of thermal sensation scales. Building Research & Information 45(5): 572–589. doi:10.1080/09613218.2016.1183185
- Schweiker, M., Hass, J., Novokhatko, A., & Halbleib, R. (eds.) (2017). Measurement and Understanding in Science. Springer: 187–206.
Conferences, workshops, and seminars organized as part of the project:
- Workshop “Scales Applied in Thermal Comfort Research”(April 2015).
- Workshop “Perception in Numbers” (June 3, 2015, Heidelberg).
International Symposium "Perception of Thermal Comfort and Pain - Are We Assessing Their Dynamics Correctly?" (November 9–10, 2017, Heidelberg).
Fellow students:
- Dr. Susanne Becker
- Dr. Marcel Schweiker
Analyzing, Measuring, and Forecasting Financial Risks Using High-Frequency Data
The project aims to improve the predictability of financial risks (A) by developing new methods for measuring and forecasting these risks using high-frequency data and (B) by developing new methods for evaluating these risk forecasts, particularly during times of crisis when such forecasts are most urgently needed. The research for this project is particularly relevant in the context of dramatically increasing trading activity in financial markets and in light of the massive losses incurred by financial institutions during and after periods of market turbulence, which affect both the broader economy and individual citizens as taxpayers.
Publications resulting from the project:
- Calzolari, G. and Halbleib, R. (2018), “Estimating stable factor models by indirect inference,” Journal of Econometrics 5, 280–301.
- Calzolari, G. and Halbleib, R. (2020), “Modeling and Forecasting Covariance Matrices: A Simple Model with Stochastic Volatility Latent Factors.” Working Paper.
- Calzolari, G., Halbleib, R., and Zagidullina, A. (2020), “A latent factor model for forecasting realized variances,” Journal of Financial Econometrics, https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbz036
- Dimitriadis, T. and Halbleib, R. (2019), “How informative is high-frequency data for tail risk estimation and forecasting? An intrinsic time perspective.” Working Paper.
- Dimitriadis, T., Halbleib, R., and Streicher, S. (2019), “Estimating Realized Variance: An Intrinsic Time Approach.” Working Paper.
Fellow:
Prof. Roxana Halbleib
Characterization of perfused vessels and hemodynamics using model- and simulation-based flow MRI (CFD-MRI)
This project presented and investigated the integration of flow simulation and flow MRI. The method is based on a topology optimization approach that minimizes the difference between simulation and measurement results. This allows underlying structures to be automatically detected and noise in the measurement data to be reduced, ultimately enabling a realistic representation through simulation and, consequently, further analysis. The method was validated and subsequently applied to medical applications. These included the calculation of wall shear stress in arteries and the application of the method to blood flow measurement data in an aorta.
Publications resulting from the project:
- F. Klemens, B. Förster, M. Dorn, G. Thäter, M. J. Krause. Solving fluid flow domain identification problems with adjoint lattice Boltzmann methods. Computers & Mathematics with Applications 79 (1), 17–33, 2020.
- F. Klemens, S. Schuhmann, R. Balbierer, G. Guthausen, H. Nirschl, G. Thäter, M. J. Krause. Noise reduction in flow MRI measurements using a lattice Boltzmann-based topology optimization approach. Computers & Fluids 197, 104391, 2020.
- F. Klemens, S. Schuhmann, G. Guthausen, G. Thäter, M. J. Krause. CFD-MRI: A coupled measurement and simulation approach for accurate fluid flow characterization and domain identification. Computers & Fluids, 166, 218–224, 2018.
- M. J. Krause, B. Förster, A. Mink, H. Nirschl. “Towards Solving Fluid Flow Domain Identification Problems with Adjoint Lattice Boltzmann Methods.” Springer International Publishing, *High Performance Computing in Science and Engineering* 16, 337–353, 2016.
- H. Mirzaee, T. Henn, M. J. Krause, L. Goubergrits, C. Schumann, M. Neugebauer, T. Kuehne, T. Preusser, A. Hennemuth. MRI-based computational hemodynamics in patients with aortic coarctation using the lattice Boltzmann methods: A clinical validation study. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 45 (1), 139–146, 2016.
Collegiate
Dr. Mathias J. Krause
How do we capture what we cannot measure?
The project aims to improve our understanding of the human mirror neuron system, which is considered the neural basis of social cognition. However, the non-invasive measurement methods applicable to humans allow only limited insight into the physiology and function of this system. Therefore, the project combined a multimodal data collection approach with computational modeling to gain new insights into the human mirror neuron system that would otherwise only be possible using invasive single-cell recordings. In the first funding period, our goal was to learn more about the physiology of the mirror neuron system, and in the second funding period, to expand our knowledge of its functionality. It was important to us to overcome existing obstacles to gaining insights through collaboration between psychology and physics.
Publications resulting from the project:
- Sadeghi, S., Schmidt, S.N., Mier, D., Hass, J. (submitted). Dynamic Causal Modeling for fMRI Using Wilson-Cowan-Based Neural Equations.
- Schmidt, S.N., Hass, J., Kirsch, P., Mier, D. (submitted). The human mirror neuron system: A common neural basis for social cognition?
- Schmidt, S.N., Sojer, C.A., Hass, J., Kirsch, P., Mier, D. (2020). fMRI adaptation reveals: The human mirror neuron system discriminates emotional valence. Cortex 128: 270–280.
- Yan, Z., Schmidt, S.N., Frank, J., Witt, S.H., Hass, J., Kirsch, P., Mier, D. (2020). Hyperfunction of the right posterior superior temporal sulcus in response to neutral facial expressions represents an endophenotype of schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology.
- Hass, J., Ardid, S., Sherfey, J., Kopell, N. (2019). Constraints on Persistent Activity in a Biologically Detailed Network Model of the Prefrontal Cortex with Heterogeneities. bioRxiv: 645663.
- Mier, D.U., Hass, J. (2017). Psychology and Physics: A Non-Invasive Approach to the Functioning of the Human Mirror Neuron System. In *Measuring and Understanding in Science*. Springer Fachmedien, Wiesbaden: 173–186.
- Schweiker, M., Hass, J., Novokhatko, A., Halbleib, R. (Eds.) (2017). Measurement and Understanding in Science: Interdisciplinary Approaches. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
- Hass, J., Hertäg, L., Durstewitz, D. (2016). A Detailed Data-Driven Network Model of the Prefrontal Cortex Reproduces Key Features of In Vivo Activity. PLoS Comput. Biol. 12(5): e1004930.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004930.
Fellow students:
- Prof. Dr. Joachim Hass
- Prof. Dr. Daniela Mier
Scopes and Correlations in Quantitative and Qualitative World-Making
The expansion of the project approach (2017–2019) builds on three findings from the first funding phase (2015–2017): 1. quality and quantity do not represent scientific methods, but rather categories of analysis; that 2. “quantifying” and “interpreting” have always been interconnected in the process of analyzing texts; and that 3. the dichotomous view of the humanities as qualitative/subjective and the natural sciences as quantitative/objective must be more strongly questioned. Building on this, the underlying epistemological question is formulated: Is the scientific object per se not already both qualitative and quantitative, and is every science therefore compelled to rely on both approaches if it is to contribute to the understanding of this object? Furthermore, in addition to quality and quantity, the little-noticed category of “relation” is to be introduced into the methodological discussion.
Publications resulting from the project:
- Jana Pacyna: (Re)counting History. Anselm of Canterbury and the English Investiture Conflicts. Perspectives of Historical Network Analysis. (A volume to be published by Brill in connection with the conference “Reading Anselm: Context and Criticism,” held at Boston College on July 27–30, 2015; expected to be published in 2020).
- Claudia Lauer: The Art of Intrigue. Studies in 12th-Century Courtly Epic Poetry. Heidelberg 2020.
- Claudia Lauer: Literary Narrative. A Theoretical Experiment on Medieval Narrative at the Intersection of Quantity and Quality. In: E. Feistner (ed.): Narration and Calculation as a Paradigm of Historical Narratology? Medieval Studies Contributions to the Interaction of Two Unequal Narrative Practices. Oldenburg 2018 (BmE Special Issue 2), pp. 65–89 (online).
- Claudia Lauer/Jana Pacyna: Counting and Narrating. Medieval Literary Studies and History in Methodological Dialogue. In: M. Schweikert et al. (eds.): Measuring and Understanding in Scholarship. Interdisciplinary Approaches. Wiesbaden 2017, pp. 23–41.
- Jana Pacyna/MichaelOtt: Visualization as Provocation? Network Analysis in Medieval Studies and Classical Studies. In: Blog of the SFB 933 Material Text Cultures: Materiality and Presence of the Written Word (https://sfb933.hypotheses.org/1211).
- Jana Pacyna/RodneyAst/Clementina Caputo/Michael Ott: Nodes, edges, and diagrams. In: Blog of the SFB 933 Material Text Cultures: Materiality and Presence of the Written Word (https://sfb933.hypotheses.org/782)
Conferences, workshops, and seminars organized as part of the project:
- Interdisciplinary and International Conference: “Visualization as Provocation? Network Analysis in Medieval Studies and Classical Studies” (April 3–4, 2019, Heidelberg Academy of Sciences and Humanities SFB 933 “Material Text Cultures,” University of Heidelberg).
- Interdisciplinary and International Workshop: “Counting and Narrating. Quantitative and Qualitative Methodologies in the Humanities” (November 27–28, 2015, Heidelberg).
- Introductory Seminar: “The Investiture Controversy: A Comparison of England and the Holy Roman Empire” (3 credit hours, Winter Semester 2018/19, University of Tübingen) Including 2 sessions: “Digital History, Historical Databases, Historical Network Analysis”
- Introductory Seminar: “A Comparative Study of Investiture Conflicts: England and the Holy Roman Empire, 1076–1122” (4 hours per week, Summer Semester 2018, Heidelberg University) Including 2 sessions: “Digital History, Historical Databases, Historical Network Analysis”
- Source-based seminar: “Anselm of Canterbury: Monastic Life and Investiture Controversies in the Anglo-Norman Empire of the 11th Century” (2 credit hours, Winter Semester 2017/18, Heidelberg University) Including 3 sessions: “Digital History, Historical Databases, Historical Network Analysis”
Fellow students:
- Dr. Jana Pacyna
- Assistant Professor Claudia Lauer, Ph.D. (part-time)
Geoinformatics as a Methodological Bridge in Interdisciplinary Natural Hazard Analysis (NEOHAZ)
The NEOHAZ project employs a combination of methods, values, and concepts from geography, sociology, and computer science. In simple terms, neogeography can be understood as the collection, sharing, and analysis of geographic data by citizens. The affected population is engaged through new participatory methods by capturing local knowledge about natural hazards. This increases individual risk awareness and willingness to take mitigation measures at the local level and enables context-appropriate measures to be implemented at the regional level. The developed methods are being applied and evaluated in Santiago de Chile, which is regularly affected by urban flooding. Additionally, the methodology is being tested in Eberbach (Neckar), allowing for a geographical comparison and an evaluation of its transferability.
For more information about the project, visit: www.geog.uni-heidelberg.de/gis/neohaz.html
Publications resulting from the project:
- Klonner, C., Usón, T.J., Aeschbach, N., Höfle, B. (under review): Participatory Mapping and Visualization of Local Knowledge: An Example from Eberbach, Germany. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science.
- Klonner, C., Usón, T.J., Marx, S., Mocnik, F.B., Höfle, B. (2018): Capturing Flood Risk Perception via Sketch Maps. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 7: 359.
- Höfle, B. (2017): Measuring and Understanding the World through Geoinformatics: The Case of Natural Hazards. In: Schweiker, M., Hass, J., Novokhatko, A., Halbleib, R.: Measuring and Understanding in Science: Interdisciplinary Approaches: 207–223.
- Klonner, C., Eckle, M., Usón, T., Höfle, B. (2017): Quality Improvement of Remotely Volunteered Geographic Information via Country-Specific Mapping Instructions. In: Proceedings of the ISCRAM 2017 Conference. Albi, France: 939–947.
- Klonner, C., Marx, S., Usón, T., Porto de Albuquerque, J., Höfle, B. (2016a): Volunteered Geographic Information. In: Natural Hazard Analysis: A Systematic Literature Review of Current Approaches with a Focus on Preparedness and Mitigation. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 5: 103.
- Klonner, C., Marx, S., Usón, T., Höfle, B. (2016b): Risk Awareness Maps of Urban Flooding via OSM Field Papers—Case Study: Santiago de Chile. In: Proceedings of the ISCRAM 2016 Conference. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: 1–14.
- Usón, T.J., Klonner, C., Höfle, B. (2016): Using participatory geographic approaches for urban flood risk in Santiago de Chile: Insights from a governance analysis. Environmental Science & Policy 66: 62–72.
- Höfle, B., Forbriger, M., Klonner, C., Marx, S., Uson, T. (2015): Neogeography of a Digital Earth: Geoinformatics as a Methodological Bridge in Interdisciplinary Natural Hazard Analysis (NEOHAZ). In: Heidelberg Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Yearbook 2014: 259–264.
Conferences, workshops, and seminars organized as part of the project:
- Geoinformatics course in the “Governance of Risk and Resources” master’s program at the Heidelberg Center for Latin America (HCLA) in Santiago, Chile
- Course at the Department of Geography at Heidelberg University: “Disaster Mapping 2.0 in Action: A project-based course on the use of Volunteered Geographic Information in Disaster Risk Management”.
Collegiate:
Prof. Dr. Bernhard Höfle
Translating Knowledge into Understanding
The basic approach of the project was to empirically investigate the impact of metaphors on perceptions within legal and political discourse. To this end, the phenomenon of “surrogacy”—which has been widely discussed in recent years—was examined. This topic is particularly suitable because it involves a counterintuitive metaphor: While “loan” generally implies the transfer of use without compensation, “surrogate” motherhood is overwhelmingly carried out for payment, and thus for compensation. The empirical investigation of the effect that the “loan” metaphor has on the perception of surrogacy is extremely complex. For this reason, the working group was only able to conduct a preliminary study over the course of two years, which resulted in a questionnaire that can now be used to carry out the main study. The research will therefore continue even after the official conclusion of the project. All participants have agreed HAdW these subsequent publications HAdW the WIN project and the HAdW .
Publications resulting from the project:
- Mohnke, M., Thomale, C., Roos, Y., & Christmann, U. (2019). Development and Validation of an “Attitude toward Surrogacy Questionnaire” in a German Population. Journal of Reproductive Medicine and Endocrinology 16 (1), 6–14.
- Thomale, Chris. The Best Interests of the Child Ex Ante – Contemporary Perspectives from Strasbourg on Surrogacy. Praxis of International Private and Procedural Law (IPRax), Bielefeld (Gieseking Verlag), 2017, pp. 583–590 (peer-reviewed).
- Thomale, Chris. “State of Play of Cross-Border Surrogacy Arrangements – Is There a Case for Regulatory Intervention by the EU?”, Journal of Private International Law (JPIL), London (Taylor & Francis), 2017, pp. 463–473 (peer-reviewed).
- Thomale, Chris. Recognition of California Surrogacy Decrees in Switzerland, Practice of International Private and Procedural Law (IPRax), Bielefeld (Gieseking Verlag), 2016, pp. 177–181 (peer-reviewed).
- Thomale, Chris. Recognition of Ukrainian Birth Certificates Based on Surrogacy in Italy, Practice of International Private and Procedural Law (IPRax), Bielefeld (Gieseking Verlag), 2016, pp. 493–498 (peer-reviewed).
Collegiate:
Prof. Dr. Chris Thomale